# Grilling the Peerlist website ID: youtube:oChfqq4e9lY Canonical HTML: https://bestsanityagency.com/videos/oChfqq4e9lY/grilling-the-peerlist-website Original source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY Author: Attribution unresolved Published: 2024-06-25T15:29:59.000Z Source checked: 2026-09-17T13:02:04.791Z Language: en Directory publisher: Roboto Studio Text: original source material. ## Scope and gaps - Transcript speakers have not been individually verified. ## Original source text In this video, we take a closer look at Peerlist, which is essentially tech LinkedIn minus the corporate reptiles. We grill Peerlist's website, and go deep with JSON LD, cutesy wireframes and performance. Looking at building your own networking platform for lizard-people? Get in touch below. Book a meeting ↓ https://robotostudio.com/call?ref=you... Socials ↓ https://robotostudio.com/ https://x.com/studioroboto   / 11290247   ## Full transcript Origin: YouTube captions (auto_generated; en) hello hello hello today's going to be an hello hello hello today's going to be an interesting one so today we are interesting one so today we are interesting one so today we are reviewing peer list now why is this reviewing peer list now why is this reviewing peer list now why is this interesting well long story short um we interesting well long story short um we interesting well long story short um we actually used Pier list quite a long actually used Pier list quite a long actually used Pier list quite a long time so we've been in there from the time so we've been in there from the time so we've been in there from the early days from back last year I think early days from back last year I think early days from back last year I think it was um with react India um incredible it was um with react India um incredible it was um with react India um incredible incredible platform it's basically a not incredible platform it's basically a not incredible platform it's basically a not crappy LinkedIn that's for Tech so crappy LinkedIn that's for Tech so crappy LinkedIn that's for Tech so whereas LinkedIn feels horrible to use whereas LinkedIn feels horrible to use whereas LinkedIn feels horrible to use and it's full of people that are and it's full of people that are and it's full of people that are basically lizards and suits um per list basically lizards and suits um per list basically lizards and suits um per list is kind of like the tech version that's is kind of like the tech version that's is kind of like the tech version that's much much nicer so with that being said much much nicer so with that being said much much nicer so with that being said I'm going to go Grill their website so I'm going to go Grill their website so I'm going to go Grill their website so let's start with this so um looking at let's start with this so um looking at let's start with this so um looking at the homepage I know exactly why this has the homepage I know exactly why this has the homepage I know exactly why this has been done um couldn't possibly be to do been done um couldn't possibly be to do been done um couldn't possibly be to do with uh Google indexing and trying to to with uh Google indexing and trying to to with uh Google indexing and trying to to essentially rank a lot of these could it essentially rank a lot of these could it essentially rank a lot of these could it um I also see this so one of the things um I also see this so one of the things um I also see this so one of the things that I think is really nice is the fact that I think is really nice is the fact that I think is really nice is the fact that you have these profiles I mean that you have these profiles I mean that you have these profiles I mean you're missing one of the best companies you're missing one of the best companies you're missing one of the best companies from this section here and one of the from this section here and one of the from this section here and one of the best people funnily enough but you know best people funnily enough but you know best people funnily enough but you know we'll we'll let all of these zist we'll we'll let all of these zist we'll we'll let all of these zist celebrities take the shine instead um celebrities take the shine instead um celebrities take the shine instead um but yeah no it's it's it's really good but yeah no it's it's it's really good but yeah no it's it's it's really good so it has a lot of incredible so it has a lot of incredible so it has a lot of incredible influential folks on here um and influential folks on here um and influential folks on here um and essentially I can see from the get-go essentially I can see from the get-go essentially I can see from the get-go that it's kind of it's It's Made in this that it's kind of it's It's Made in this that it's kind of it's It's Made in this table View and I love this table view I table View and I love this table view I table View and I love this table view I think this is actually really good um think this is actually really good um think this is actually really good um there is something else I want to see there is something else I want to see there is something else I want to see because I did see it earlier on is it because I did see it earlier on is it because I did see it earlier on is it inside of companies yes so this is one inside of companies yes so this is one inside of companies yes so this is one of the things that I don't like about of the things that I don't like about of the things that I don't like about the website is this so this weird the website is this so this weird the website is this so this weird looking handdrawn looking handdrawn looking handdrawn scribbly uh Mac OS style although I do scribbly uh Mac OS style although I do scribbly uh Mac OS style although I do really like this it doesn't match the really like this it doesn't match the really like this it doesn't match the rest of the website like everything else rest of the website like everything else rest of the website like everything else is clean lines look at these nice clean is clean lines look at these nice clean is clean lines look at these nice clean lines and then boom you get um Fisher lines and then boom you get um Fisher lines and then boom you get um Fisher Price my first tabs which is not the the Price my first tabs which is not the the Price my first tabs which is not the the way to go but I do like this in general way to go but I do like this in general way to go but I do like this in general it's it's nitpicking we're splitting it's it's nitpicking we're splitting it's it's nitpicking we're splitting hiss um I also really like I'm a sucker hiss um I also really like I'm a sucker hiss um I also really like I'm a sucker for these things where they they switch for these things where they they switch for these things where they they switch through um and again they use the exact through um and again they use the exact through um and again they use the exact same motif I think it just especially same motif I think it just especially same motif I think it just especially doesn't match here because if you look doesn't match here because if you look doesn't match here because if you look at these these kind of have this like at these these kind of have this like at these these kind of have this like skew morphic long drop Shadows nice and skew morphic long drop Shadows nice and skew morphic long drop Shadows nice and subtle um whereas the the Chrome browser subtle um whereas the the Chrome browser subtle um whereas the the Chrome browser kind of has this cutesy look which isn't kind of has this cutesy look which isn't kind of has this cutesy look which isn't you know it's not the same thing um and you know it's not the same thing um and you know it's not the same thing um and again very very nice very easy to use again very very nice very easy to use again very very nice very easy to use very fast um but I now want to go into very fast um but I now want to go into very fast um but I now want to go into some of the different parts of this now some of the different parts of this now some of the different parts of this now I actually got a Google uh Lighthouse I actually got a Google uh Lighthouse I actually got a Google uh Lighthouse performance thing from a long long time performance thing from a long long time performance thing from a long long time ago so I'm going to swap between these ago so I'm going to swap between these ago so I'm going to swap between these and we're going to kind of oh look at and we're going to kind of oh look at and we're going to kind of oh look at this great one yeah this one's this this great one yeah this one's this this great one yeah this one's this one's one of the things I wanted to talk one's one of the things I wanted to talk one's one of the things I wanted to talk about so obviously these um so let me about so obviously these um so let me about so obviously these um so let me see if oh this is the other see if oh this is the other see if oh this is the other one here we go so first thing I noticed one here we go so first thing I noticed one here we go so first thing I noticed is that your structured data is broken is that your structured data is broken is that your structured data is broken so the object member name or whatever so the object member name or whatever so the object member name or whatever the hell is going off here looks as the hell is going off here looks as the hell is going off here looks as though it's missing a little curly though it's missing a little curly though it's missing a little curly bracket somewhere in here um I suspect bracket somewhere in here um I suspect bracket somewhere in here um I suspect it's the Json that's broken uh just it's the Json that's broken uh just it's the Json that's broken uh just double check it and if you're not double check it and if you're not double check it and if you're not already using it uh you can use uh already using it uh you can use uh already using it uh you can use uh what's it called uh schema DTS I think what's it called uh schema DTS I think what's it called uh schema DTS I think it's called the typescript package um to it's called the typescript package um to it's called the typescript package um to essentially match it up with your uh essentially match it up with your uh essentially match it up with your uh database response so hopefully that database response so hopefully that database response so hopefully that could help with you here um same could help with you here um same could help with you here um same principle applies at least from when I principle applies at least from when I principle applies at least from when I was running it through the tester for was running it through the tester for was running it through the tester for the actual homepage of P list so I can the actual homepage of P list so I can the actual homepage of P list so I can see again this is not just exclusive to see again this is not just exclusive to see again this is not just exclusive to breaking on our company's website or our breaking on our company's website or our breaking on our company's website or our company's page it's actually broken on P company's page it's actually broken on P company's page it's actually broken on P list as well so I know you're not just list as well so I know you're not just list as well so I know you're not just um snubbing me um snubbing me um snubbing me basically and then we go on to um the basically and then we go on to um the basically and then we go on to um the page speed insights which are quite page speed insights which are quite page speed insights which are quite interesting so page speed insights this interesting so page speed insights this interesting so page speed insights this one's using the actual uh website itself one's using the actual uh website itself one's using the actual uh website itself they do differ from time to time so I they do differ from time to time so I they do differ from time to time so I don't want to say that this is a solid don't want to say that this is a solid don't want to say that this is a solid you know D minus performance um I think you know D minus performance um I think you know D minus performance um I think it's a lot better than this and it feels it's a lot better than this and it feels it's a lot better than this and it feels a lot faster um however this is what I a lot faster um however this is what I a lot faster um however this is what I got from this particular performance and got from this particular performance and got from this particular performance and I want to go through it very quickly and I want to go through it very quickly and I want to go through it very quickly and kind of talk about a couple of different kind of talk about a couple of different kind of talk about a couple of different things um so first of all let me che things um so first of all let me che things um so first of all let me che check very quickly if if P list I forgot check very quickly if if P list I forgot check very quickly if if P list I forgot what the tech stack is inside of here uh what the tech stack is inside of here uh what the tech stack is inside of here uh nextjs okay cool so I can Grill it on nextjs okay cool so I can Grill it on nextjs okay cool so I can Grill it on the nextjs front um other thing here and the nextjs front um other thing here and the nextjs front um other thing here and I think you are using Tailwind from I think you are using Tailwind from I think you are using Tailwind from memory so yeah you are using Tailwind memory so yeah you are using Tailwind memory so yeah you are using Tailwind but there is things like U emotion JS but there is things like U emotion JS but there is things like U emotion JS and depending on what you're doing with and depending on what you're doing with and depending on what you're doing with that um it may be worthwhile let me just that um it may be worthwhile let me just that um it may be worthwhile let me just check one more thing um yeah so so to check one more thing um yeah so so to check one more thing um yeah so so to see if you can bump the version of nexj see if you can bump the version of nexj see if you can bump the version of nexj up nextjs up and as I always say a nice up nextjs up and as I always say a nice up nextjs up and as I always say a nice easy solution to this um if you can get easy solution to this um if you can get easy solution to this um if you can get it up to the latest version and the it up to the latest version and the it up to the latest version and the canary version potentially you can run canary version potentially you can run canary version potentially you can run the experimental partial pre-rendering the experimental partial pre-rendering the experimental partial pre-rendering which means that when somebody hits your which means that when somebody hits your which means that when somebody hits your website for the first time it gets the website for the first time it gets the website for the first time it gets the response a lot faster um before you response a lot faster um before you response a lot faster um before you actually see you know the the actually see you know the the actually see you know the the interactivity of the website um so let's interactivity of the website um so let's interactivity of the website um so let's go back let's go check this out and go back let's go check this out and go back let's go check this out and let's break down the page speed insights let's break down the page speed insights let's break down the page speed insights um so again visually P list is is close um so again visually P list is is close um so again visually P list is is close to perfect to perfect to perfect as I would say and I even like the fact as I would say and I even like the fact as I would say and I even like the fact that you're not using a sanser font that you're not using a sanser font that you're not using a sanser font you're using this like semic cursive you're using this like semic cursive you're using this like semic cursive serif font um I think this looks really serif font um I think this looks really serif font um I think this looks really cool and it tells me exactly what you do cool and it tells me exactly what you do cool and it tells me exactly what you do I mean you've you've not wasted any I mean you've you've not wasted any I mean you've you've not wasted any screen re real estate with telling me screen re real estate with telling me screen re real estate with telling me you know it's a professional Network for you know it's a professional Network for you know it's a professional Network for people in Tech so yeah very impressed people in Tech so yeah very impressed people in Tech so yeah very impressed and again social proof all of these and again social proof all of these and again social proof all of these folks I know a lot of these people that folks I know a lot of these people that folks I know a lot of these people that are on here so it's really cool that are on here so it's really cool that are on here so it's really cool that you've got that too um and all these you've got that too um and all these you've got that too um and all these different bits and pieces at the bottom different bits and pieces at the bottom different bits and pieces at the bottom oh you know what I have never seen this oh you know what I have never seen this oh you know what I have never seen this before I didn't even clock this love before I didn't even clock this love before I didn't even clock this love these animations this is really nice these animations this is really nice these animations this is really nice really tasty um and fact that it it goes really tasty um and fact that it it goes really tasty um and fact that it it goes to like there you go to like there you go to like there you go cool yeah so main thread work when I was cool yeah so main thread work when I was cool yeah so main thread work when I was looking through this a lot of this is looking through this a lot of this is looking through this a lot of this is going to be um analytics tools and going to be um analytics tools and going to be um analytics tools and what's not analytics tools I would what's not analytics tools I would what's not analytics tools I would definitely recommend running next uh definitely recommend running next uh definitely recommend running next uh bundle analyzers so there is a good bundle analyzers so there is a good bundle analyzers so there is a good chunk of stuff in here that I imagine chunk of stuff in here that I imagine chunk of stuff in here that I imagine you already are aware about um and you you already are aware about um and you you already are aware about um and you basically are taking the trade off of basically are taking the trade off of basically are taking the trade off of the performance hit for the richness of the performance hit for the richness of the performance hit for the richness of the analytics however one of the ones the analytics however one of the ones the analytics however one of the ones that most people don't know about that most people don't know about that most people don't know about necessarily is the Google tag manager necessarily is the Google tag manager necessarily is the Google tag manager one so um next actually has a nextjs one so um next actually has a nextjs one so um next actually has a nextjs third party libraries section uh just third party libraries section uh just third party libraries section uh just double check whether you can actually double check whether you can actually double check whether you can actually use this so they actually have a Google use this so they actually have a Google use this so they actually have a Google tag manager and they actually have a tag manager and they actually have a tag manager and they actually have a Google analytics somewhere in here uh Google analytics somewhere in here uh Google analytics somewhere in here uh where are we there we go Google where are we there we go Google where are we there we go Google analytics so they have both um I don't analytics so they have both um I don't analytics so they have both um I don't know if you're using them already it know if you're using them already it know if you're using them already it might improve performance I'm not sure might improve performance I'm not sure might improve performance I'm not sure um but ultimately that's one of them and um but ultimately that's one of them and um but ultimately that's one of them and again I'm seeing a lot more of just again I'm seeing a lot more of just again I'm seeing a lot more of just analytics tools and such here um the analytics tools and such here um the analytics tools and such here um the minimize main threadwork so this one is minimize main threadwork so this one is minimize main threadwork so this one is almost always a misnomer uh whenever we almost always a misnomer uh whenever we almost always a misnomer uh whenever we read this uh and a lot of this is down read this uh and a lot of this is down read this uh and a lot of this is down to script evaluation which is to be to script evaluation which is to be to script evaluation which is to be expected if you pack the website expected if you pack the website expected if you pack the website absolutely full with analytics um you absolutely full with analytics um you absolutely full with analytics um you better have a good terms and conditions better have a good terms and conditions better have a good terms and conditions with that as well um but yeah so and with that as well um but yeah so and with that as well um but yeah so and largest contentful paint this absolutely largest contentful paint this absolutely largest contentful paint this absolutely tanked I have no idea why it's saying tanked I have no idea why it's saying tanked I have no idea why it's saying 19.2 seconds I have a feeling that this 19.2 seconds I have a feeling that this 19.2 seconds I have a feeling that this again is a misnomer I don't think it again is a misnomer I don't think it again is a misnomer I don't think it actually is this um but there is a actually is this um but there is a actually is this um but there is a gigantic load delay and I suspect again gigantic load delay and I suspect again gigantic load delay and I suspect again it may be due to analytic it may be due to analytic it may be due to analytic depending on what you're doing at some depending on what you're doing at some depending on what you're doing at some point it may be reducing the analytics point it may be reducing the analytics point it may be reducing the analytics on some of the pages or dynamically on some of the pages or dynamically on some of the pages or dynamically loading these in depending on what loading these in depending on what loading these in depending on what you're going to do and whether which you're going to do and whether which you're going to do and whether which analytics are important on which part of analytics are important on which part of analytics are important on which part of the site if it's just a flat importance the site if it's just a flat importance the site if it's just a flat importance and that out that basically outweighs and that out that basically outweighs and that out that basically outweighs the cost of the website itself then you the cost of the website itself then you the cost of the website itself then you know so be it um another thing I found know so be it um another thing I found know so be it um another thing I found interesting was whether you wanted to uh interesting was whether you wanted to uh interesting was whether you wanted to uh split at some point basically get them split at some point basically get them split at some point basically get them and I don't know the the the way that and I don't know the the the way that and I don't know the the the way that it's currently structured but it may be it's currently structured but it may be it's currently structured but it may be worth it some point splitting it into a worth it some point splitting it into a worth it some point splitting it into a mono repo if you haven't already um and mono repo if you haven't already um and mono repo if you haven't already um and having a kind of isolated website side having a kind of isolated website side having a kind of isolated website side of things and the app side of things so of things and the app side of things so of things and the app side of things so that the bundle basically doesn't get that the bundle basically doesn't get that the bundle basically doesn't get combined and you are essentially only combined and you are essentially only combined and you are essentially only loading those performance uh aspects on loading those performance uh aspects on loading those performance uh aspects on the web app side of things and then that the web app side of things and then that the web app side of things and then that leaves you the actual website side of leaves you the actual website side of leaves you the actual website side of things to really kind of build up on the things to really kind of build up on the things to really kind of build up on the SEO performance uh side um but yeah that SEO performance uh side um but yeah that SEO performance uh side um but yeah that was that was one of the thoughts that I was that was one of the thoughts that I was that was one of the thoughts that I had and again Google tag manager New had and again Google tag manager New had and again Google tag manager New Relic Clarity Google Analytics Relic Clarity Google Analytics Relic Clarity Google Analytics um some Cloud front stuff here I'm um some Cloud front stuff here I'm um some Cloud front stuff here I'm guessing this is just using the CDN or guessing this is just using the CDN or guessing this is just using the CDN or something along those lines um I mean something along those lines um I mean something along those lines um I mean cloud cloud front's great if you've got cloud cloud front's great if you've got cloud cloud front's great if you've got 120k in your back pocket so don't worry 120k in your back pocket so don't worry 120k in your back pocket so don't worry about that just joking obviously I don't about that just joking obviously I don't about that just joking obviously I don't know if you saw that recently but know if you saw that recently but know if you saw that recently but obviously just be aware that if you ever obviously just be aware that if you ever obviously just be aware that if you ever decide to take the pivot into gambling decide to take the pivot into gambling decide to take the pivot into gambling websites you're probably going to see a websites you're probably going to see a websites you're probably going to see a massive bill um and again um the reduce massive bill um and again um the reduce massive bill um and again um the reduce unused CSS there are some things that unused CSS there are some things that unused CSS there are some things that you can yeah basically this so the you can yeah basically this so the you can yeah basically this so the beauty of this website is that you beauty of this website is that you beauty of this website is that you actually can um put this this this now actually can um put this this this now actually can um put this this this now gives you personalized nextjs results uh gives you personalized nextjs results uh gives you personalized nextjs results uh this is only a recent thing I think it's this is only a recent thing I think it's this is only a recent thing I think it's in the last year um this lazy loading in the last year um this lazy loading in the last year um this lazy loading thing so make sure if you are using next thing so make sure if you are using next thing so make sure if you are using next image which you are not you're image which you are not you're image which you are not you're using Cloud front Okay so there's some using Cloud front Okay so there's some using Cloud front Okay so there's some sort of on the-fly optimization from sort of on the-fly optimization from sort of on the-fly optimization from cloudfront I'm guessing um basically cloudfront I'm guessing um basically cloudfront I'm guessing um basically just see if you can set priority on it just see if you can set priority on it just see if you can set priority on it if you haven't already if you haven't already if you haven't already um and rather than a lazy load but it um and rather than a lazy load but it um and rather than a lazy load but it may be a requirement with what you're may be a requirement with what you're may be a requirement with what you're doing properly sized images this is doing properly sized images this is doing properly sized images this is negligible when you see 67 kilobytes negligible when you see 67 kilobytes negligible when you see 67 kilobytes it's not a big deal a lot of this load it's not a big deal a lot of this load it's not a big deal a lot of this load is going to be inside of the actual is going to be inside of the actual is going to be inside of the actual JavaScript itself rather than anything JavaScript itself rather than anything JavaScript itself rather than anything else um the efficient efficient cash else um the efficient efficient cash else um the efficient efficient cash policy again this is all CDN stuff by policy again this is all CDN stuff by policy again this is all CDN stuff by the looks of it which makes the looks of it which makes the looks of it which makes sense uh anything inside of here sense uh anything inside of here sense uh anything inside of here analytics analytics analytics nope uh nope uh nope uh Legacy okay sometimes times I'm not sure Legacy okay sometimes times I'm not sure Legacy okay sometimes times I'm not sure if this is the same oh it's look I'm not if this is the same oh it's look I'm not if this is the same oh it's look I'm not going to I'm not going to get bent out going to I'm not going to get bent out going to I'm not going to get bent out of shape over that I mean it's even of shape over that I mean it's even of shape over that I mean it's even saying zero kilobytes here and the saying zero kilobytes here and the saying zero kilobytes here and the network payload so I'm guessing this is network payload so I'm guessing this is network payload so I'm guessing this is due to the amount of data that gets due to the amount of data that gets due to the amount of data that gets passed across I have a feeling it's passed across I have a feeling it's passed across I have a feeling it's going to be the majority if it's going going to be the majority if it's going going to be the majority if it's going to be related to that so um from a to be related to that so um from a to be related to that so um from a performance perspective um you you can performance perspective um you you can performance perspective um you you can do better you can get this PPR stuff do better you can get this PPR stuff do better you can get this PPR stuff working and it would basically put this working and it would basically put this working and it would basically put this um you know this like progression over um you know this like progression over um you know this like progression over time it would load a little bit earlier time it would load a little bit earlier time it would load a little bit earlier but it depends on the latest version of but it depends on the latest version of but it depends on the latest version of nextjs and I know this is a massive nextjs and I know this is a massive nextjs and I know this is a massive application so it's a bit optimistic to application so it's a bit optimistic to application so it's a bit optimistic to say you know oh just just go up to the say you know oh just just go up to the say you know oh just just go up to the latest version and just make it work but latest version and just make it work but latest version and just make it work but that would be one of the things that's a that would be one of the things that's a that would be one of the things that's a nice easy fix because it should in nice easy fix because it should in nice easy fix because it should in theory only be um three lines I believe theory only be um three lines I believe theory only be um three lines I believe oh last thing I want to check as well um oh last thing I want to check as well um oh last thing I want to check as well um if I hit the network very quick I always if I hit the network very quick I always if I hit the network very quick I always like to check if you are caching this um like to check if you are caching this um like to check if you are caching this um so I hit this here and you can go have a so I hit this here and you can go have a so I hit this here and you can go have a look and see if there is is look and see if there is is look and see if there is is a uh this doesn't look like it's being a uh this doesn't look like it's being a uh this doesn't look like it's being cached how is it being cached how is it being cached how is it being handled okay yeah so I have a feeling handled okay yeah so I have a feeling handled okay yeah so I have a feeling this isn't cached but I also think it this isn't cached but I also think it this isn't cached but I also think it may be because you're doing it may be because you're doing it may be because you're doing it specifically um and I don't know I can't specifically um and I don't know I can't specifically um and I don't know I can't give you exact specific advice because give you exact specific advice because give you exact specific advice because of how it's being built how is it being of how it's being built how is it being of how it's being built how is it being built oh also I know that Microsoft built oh also I know that Microsoft built oh also I know that Microsoft Clarity is pretty good because this is Clarity is pretty good because this is Clarity is pretty good because this is this is basically hot jaw but for free this is basically hot jaw but for free this is basically hot jaw but for free that Google's pretty much fronting the that Google's pretty much fronting the that Google's pretty much fronting the cost on cost on cost on um I see yeah you're doing something um I see yeah you're doing something um I see yeah you're doing something custom from the hos inside um I I would custom from the hos inside um I I would custom from the hos inside um I I would not want to comment on that because they not want to comment on that because they not want to comment on that because they can be so wildly different for can be so wildly different for can be so wildly different for everybody's individual uh circumstances everybody's individual uh circumstances everybody's individual uh circumstances so I hope that is a good Grill and a so I hope that is a good Grill and a so I hope that is a good Grill and a good uh set of feedback tell me if good uh set of feedback tell me if good uh set of feedback tell me if there's anything in particular you want there's anything in particular you want there's anything in particular you want me to go back to you with in granular me to go back to you with in granular me to go back to you with in granular detail and we'll try and help out but detail and we'll try and help out but detail and we'll try and help out but yeah hope you have a great day and keep yeah hope you have a great day and keep yeah hope you have a great day and keep making incredible work so yeah take care making incredible work so yeah take care making incredible work so yeah take care bye ## Timestamped captions ### segment-1 [2.9s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=2) hello hello hello today's going to be an ### segment-2 [2.9s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=2) hello hello hello today's going to be an interesting one so today we are ### segment-3 [5.2s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=5) interesting one so today we are ### segment-4 [5.2s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=5) interesting one so today we are reviewing peer list now why is this ### segment-5 [8.0s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=7) reviewing peer list now why is this ### segment-6 [8.0s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=8) reviewing peer list now why is this interesting well long story short um we ### segment-7 [10.9s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=10) interesting well long story short um we ### segment-8 [10.9s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=10) interesting well long story short um we actually used Pier list quite a long ### segment-9 [12.8s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=12) actually used Pier list quite a long ### segment-10 [12.8s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=12) actually used Pier list quite a long time so we've been in there from the ### segment-11 [13.9s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=13) time so we've been in there from the ### segment-12 [14.0s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=13) time so we've been in there from the early days from back last year I think ### segment-13 [16.1s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=16) early days from back last year I think ### segment-14 [16.1s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=16) early days from back last year I think it was um with react India um incredible ### segment-15 [20.3s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=20) it was um with react India um incredible ### segment-16 [20.3s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=20) it was um with react India um incredible incredible platform it's basically a not ### segment-17 [22.4s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=22) incredible platform it's basically a not ### segment-18 [22.4s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=22) incredible platform it's basically a not crappy LinkedIn that's for Tech so ### segment-19 [25.6s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=25) crappy LinkedIn that's for Tech so ### segment-20 [25.6s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=25) crappy LinkedIn that's for Tech so whereas LinkedIn feels horrible to use ### segment-21 [27.9s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=27) whereas LinkedIn feels horrible to use ### segment-22 [27.9s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=27) whereas LinkedIn feels horrible to use and it's full of people that are ### segment-23 [29.0s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=28) and it's full of people that are ### segment-24 [29.0s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=29) and it's full of people that are basically lizards and suits um per list ### segment-25 [31.6s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=31) basically lizards and suits um per list ### segment-26 [31.6s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=31) basically lizards and suits um per list is kind of like the tech version that's ### segment-27 [33.0s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=32) is kind of like the tech version that's ### segment-28 [33.0s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=33) is kind of like the tech version that's much much nicer so with that being said ### segment-29 [35.4s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=35) much much nicer so with that being said ### segment-30 [35.4s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=35) much much nicer so with that being said I'm going to go Grill their website so ### segment-31 [37.1s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=37) I'm going to go Grill their website so ### segment-32 [37.1s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=37) I'm going to go Grill their website so let's start with this so um looking at ### segment-33 [39.5s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=39) let's start with this so um looking at ### segment-34 [39.5s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=39) let's start with this so um looking at the homepage I know exactly why this has ### segment-35 [41.4s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=41) the homepage I know exactly why this has ### segment-36 [41.4s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=41) the homepage I know exactly why this has been done um couldn't possibly be to do ### segment-37 [43.9s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=43) been done um couldn't possibly be to do ### segment-38 [43.9s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=43) been done um couldn't possibly be to do with uh Google indexing and trying to to ### segment-39 [47.4s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=47) with uh Google indexing and trying to to ### segment-40 [47.4s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=47) with uh Google indexing and trying to to essentially rank a lot of these could it ### segment-41 [50.7s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=50) essentially rank a lot of these could it ### segment-42 [50.7s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=50) essentially rank a lot of these could it um I also see this so one of the things ### segment-43 [52.2s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=52) um I also see this so one of the things ### segment-44 [52.2s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=52) um I also see this so one of the things that I think is really nice is the fact ### segment-45 [54.0s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=54) that I think is really nice is the fact ### segment-46 [54.0s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=54) that I think is really nice is the fact that you have these profiles I mean ### segment-47 [55.8s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=55) that you have these profiles I mean ### segment-48 [55.8s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=55) that you have these profiles I mean you're missing one of the best companies ### segment-49 [58.3s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=58) you're missing one of the best companies ### segment-50 [58.3s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=58) you're missing one of the best companies from this section here and one of the ### segment-51 [60.0s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=60) from this section here and one of the ### segment-52 [60.0s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=60) from this section here and one of the best people funnily enough but you know ### segment-53 [62.1s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=62) best people funnily enough but you know ### segment-54 [62.2s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=62) best people funnily enough but you know we'll we'll let all of these zist ### segment-55 [63.6s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=63) we'll we'll let all of these zist ### segment-56 [63.6s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=63) we'll we'll let all of these zist celebrities take the shine instead um ### segment-57 [65.9s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=65) celebrities take the shine instead um ### segment-58 [65.9s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=65) celebrities take the shine instead um but yeah no it's it's it's really good ### segment-59 [67.7s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=67) but yeah no it's it's it's really good ### segment-60 [67.7s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=67) but yeah no it's it's it's really good so it has a lot of incredible ### segment-61 [69.0s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=68) so it has a lot of incredible ### segment-62 [69.0s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=69) so it has a lot of incredible influential folks on here um and ### segment-63 [72.3s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=72) influential folks on here um and ### segment-64 [72.3s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=72) influential folks on here um and essentially I can see from the get-go ### segment-65 [74.6s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=74) essentially I can see from the get-go ### segment-66 [74.6s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=74) essentially I can see from the get-go that it's kind of it's It's Made in this ### segment-67 [76.8s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=76) that it's kind of it's It's Made in this ### segment-68 [76.8s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=76) that it's kind of it's It's Made in this table View and I love this table view I ### segment-69 [79.0s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=79) table View and I love this table view I ### segment-70 [79.0s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=79) table View and I love this table view I think this is actually really good um ### segment-71 [81.0s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=80) think this is actually really good um ### segment-72 [81.0s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=80) think this is actually really good um there is something else I want to see ### segment-73 [82.4s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=82) there is something else I want to see ### segment-74 [82.4s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=82) there is something else I want to see because I did see it earlier on is it ### segment-75 [83.7s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=83) because I did see it earlier on is it ### segment-76 [83.8s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=83) because I did see it earlier on is it inside of companies yes so this is one ### segment-77 [85.9s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=85) inside of companies yes so this is one ### segment-78 [85.9s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=85) inside of companies yes so this is one of the things that I don't like about ### segment-79 [87.6s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=87) of the things that I don't like about ### segment-80 [87.6s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=87) of the things that I don't like about the website is this so this weird ### segment-81 [90.4s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=90) the website is this so this weird ### segment-82 [90.4s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=90) the website is this so this weird looking handdrawn ### segment-83 [92.6s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=92) looking handdrawn ### segment-84 [92.6s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=92) looking handdrawn scribbly uh Mac OS style although I do ### segment-85 [96.5s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=96) scribbly uh Mac OS style although I do ### segment-86 [96.5s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=96) scribbly uh Mac OS style although I do really like this it doesn't match the ### segment-87 [98.3s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=98) really like this it doesn't match the ### segment-88 [98.3s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=98) really like this it doesn't match the rest of the website like everything else ### segment-89 [99.7s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=99) rest of the website like everything else ### segment-90 [99.7s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=99) rest of the website like everything else is clean lines look at these nice clean ### segment-91 [101.3s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=101) is clean lines look at these nice clean ### segment-92 [101.3s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=101) is clean lines look at these nice clean lines and then boom you get um Fisher ### segment-93 [105.1s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=105) lines and then boom you get um Fisher ### segment-94 [105.1s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=105) lines and then boom you get um Fisher Price my first tabs which is not the the ### segment-95 [108.1s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=108) Price my first tabs which is not the the ### segment-96 [108.1s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=108) Price my first tabs which is not the the way to go but I do like this in general ### segment-97 [110.3s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=110) way to go but I do like this in general ### segment-98 [110.3s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=110) way to go but I do like this in general it's it's nitpicking we're splitting ### segment-99 [111.9s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=111) it's it's nitpicking we're splitting ### segment-100 [111.9s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=111) it's it's nitpicking we're splitting hiss um I also really like I'm a sucker ### segment-101 [114.6s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=114) hiss um I also really like I'm a sucker ### segment-102 [114.6s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=114) hiss um I also really like I'm a sucker for these things where they they switch ### segment-103 [116.2s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=116) for these things where they they switch ### segment-104 [116.2s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=116) for these things where they they switch through um and again they use the exact ### segment-105 [118.5s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=118) through um and again they use the exact ### segment-106 [118.5s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=118) through um and again they use the exact same motif I think it just especially ### segment-107 [121.5s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=121) same motif I think it just especially ### segment-108 [121.5s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=121) same motif I think it just especially doesn't match here because if you look ### segment-109 [122.7s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=122) doesn't match here because if you look ### segment-110 [122.7s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=122) doesn't match here because if you look at these these kind of have this like ### segment-111 [123.8s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=123) at these these kind of have this like ### segment-112 [123.8s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=123) at these these kind of have this like skew morphic long drop Shadows nice and ### segment-113 [127.2s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=127) skew morphic long drop Shadows nice and ### segment-114 [127.2s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=127) skew morphic long drop Shadows nice and subtle um whereas the the Chrome browser ### segment-115 [129.8s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=129) subtle um whereas the the Chrome browser ### segment-116 [129.8s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=129) subtle um whereas the the Chrome browser kind of has this cutesy look which isn't ### segment-117 [131.8s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=131) kind of has this cutesy look which isn't ### segment-118 [131.8s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=131) kind of has this cutesy look which isn't you know it's not the same thing um and ### segment-119 [134.6s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=134) you know it's not the same thing um and ### segment-120 [134.6s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=134) you know it's not the same thing um and again very very nice very easy to use ### segment-121 [137.6s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=137) again very very nice very easy to use ### segment-122 [137.6s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=137) again very very nice very easy to use very fast um but I now want to go into ### segment-123 [141.2s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=141) very fast um but I now want to go into ### segment-124 [141.2s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=141) very fast um but I now want to go into some of the different parts of this now ### segment-125 [142.9s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=142) some of the different parts of this now ### segment-126 [142.9s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=142) some of the different parts of this now I actually got a Google uh Lighthouse ### segment-127 [146.3s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=146) I actually got a Google uh Lighthouse ### segment-128 [146.4s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=146) I actually got a Google uh Lighthouse performance thing from a long long time ### segment-129 [147.9s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=147) performance thing from a long long time ### segment-130 [148.0s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=147) performance thing from a long long time ago so I'm going to swap between these ### segment-131 [149.6s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=149) ago so I'm going to swap between these ### segment-132 [149.6s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=149) ago so I'm going to swap between these and we're going to kind of oh look at ### segment-133 [151.3s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=151) and we're going to kind of oh look at ### segment-134 [151.3s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=151) and we're going to kind of oh look at this great one yeah this one's this ### segment-135 [152.6s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=152) this great one yeah this one's this ### segment-136 [152.6s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=152) this great one yeah this one's this one's one of the things I wanted to talk ### segment-137 [153.9s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=153) one's one of the things I wanted to talk ### segment-138 [153.9s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=153) one's one of the things I wanted to talk about so obviously these um so let me ### segment-139 [158.4s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=158) about so obviously these um so let me ### segment-140 [158.4s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=158) about so obviously these um so let me see if oh this is the other ### segment-141 [160.2s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=160) see if oh this is the other ### segment-142 [160.2s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=160) see if oh this is the other one here we go so first thing I noticed ### segment-143 [163.7s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=163) one here we go so first thing I noticed ### segment-144 [163.7s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=163) one here we go so first thing I noticed is that your structured data is broken ### segment-145 [166.3s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=166) is that your structured data is broken ### segment-146 [166.4s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=166) is that your structured data is broken so the object member name or whatever ### segment-147 [168.2s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=168) so the object member name or whatever ### segment-148 [168.2s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=168) so the object member name or whatever the hell is going off here looks as ### segment-149 [169.5s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=169) the hell is going off here looks as ### segment-150 [169.5s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=169) the hell is going off here looks as though it's missing a little curly ### segment-151 [172.3s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=172) though it's missing a little curly ### segment-152 [172.3s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=172) though it's missing a little curly bracket somewhere in here um I suspect ### segment-153 [175.3s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=175) bracket somewhere in here um I suspect ### segment-154 [175.3s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=175) bracket somewhere in here um I suspect it's the Json that's broken uh just ### segment-155 [177.9s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=177) it's the Json that's broken uh just ### segment-156 [178.0s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=177) it's the Json that's broken uh just double check it and if you're not ### segment-157 [179.0s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=179) double check it and if you're not ### segment-158 [179.0s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=179) double check it and if you're not already using it uh you can use uh ### segment-159 [182.3s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=182) already using it uh you can use uh ### segment-160 [182.4s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=182) already using it uh you can use uh what's it called uh schema DTS I think ### segment-161 [185.3s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=185) what's it called uh schema DTS I think ### segment-162 [185.4s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=185) what's it called uh schema DTS I think it's called the typescript package um to ### segment-163 [187.5s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=187) it's called the typescript package um to ### segment-164 [187.5s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=187) it's called the typescript package um to essentially match it up with your uh ### segment-165 [189.4s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=189) essentially match it up with your uh ### segment-166 [189.4s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=189) essentially match it up with your uh database response so hopefully that ### segment-167 [191.0s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=190) database response so hopefully that ### segment-168 [191.0s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=191) database response so hopefully that could help with you here um same ### segment-169 [192.9s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=192) could help with you here um same ### segment-170 [192.9s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=192) could help with you here um same principle applies at least from when I ### segment-171 [194.2s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=194) principle applies at least from when I ### segment-172 [194.2s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=194) principle applies at least from when I was running it through the tester for ### segment-173 [195.8s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=195) was running it through the tester for ### segment-174 [195.8s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=195) was running it through the tester for the actual homepage of P list so I can ### segment-175 [197.6s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=197) the actual homepage of P list so I can ### segment-176 [197.6s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=197) the actual homepage of P list so I can see again this is not just exclusive to ### segment-177 [199.5s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=199) see again this is not just exclusive to ### segment-178 [199.5s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=199) see again this is not just exclusive to breaking on our company's website or our ### segment-179 [202.1s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=202) breaking on our company's website or our ### segment-180 [202.1s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=202) breaking on our company's website or our company's page it's actually broken on P ### segment-181 [204.3s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=204) company's page it's actually broken on P ### segment-182 [204.4s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=204) company's page it's actually broken on P list as well so I know you're not just ### segment-183 [206.4s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=206) list as well so I know you're not just ### segment-184 [206.4s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=206) list as well so I know you're not just um snubbing me ### segment-185 [208.4s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=208) um snubbing me ### segment-186 [208.4s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=208) um snubbing me basically and then we go on to um the ### segment-187 [211.6s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=211) basically and then we go on to um the ### segment-188 [211.6s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=211) basically and then we go on to um the page speed insights which are quite ### segment-189 [213.2s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=213) page speed insights which are quite ### segment-190 [213.2s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=213) page speed insights which are quite interesting so page speed insights this ### segment-191 [215.6s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=215) interesting so page speed insights this ### segment-192 [215.6s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=215) interesting so page speed insights this one's using the actual uh website itself ### segment-193 [218.7s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=218) one's using the actual uh website itself ### segment-194 [218.7s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=218) one's using the actual uh website itself they do differ from time to time so I ### segment-195 [220.6s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=220) they do differ from time to time so I ### segment-196 [220.6s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=220) they do differ from time to time so I don't want to say that this is a solid ### segment-197 [222.2s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=222) don't want to say that this is a solid ### segment-198 [222.2s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=222) don't want to say that this is a solid you know D minus performance um I think ### segment-199 [225.3s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=225) you know D minus performance um I think ### segment-200 [225.3s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=225) you know D minus performance um I think it's a lot better than this and it feels ### segment-201 [227.4s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=227) it's a lot better than this and it feels ### segment-202 [227.4s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=227) it's a lot better than this and it feels a lot faster um however this is what I ### segment-203 [230.1s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=230) a lot faster um however this is what I ### segment-204 [230.2s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=230) a lot faster um however this is what I got from this particular performance and ### segment-205 [232.3s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=232) got from this particular performance and ### segment-206 [232.3s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=232) got from this particular performance and I want to go through it very quickly and ### segment-207 [233.5s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=233) I want to go through it very quickly and ### segment-208 [233.5s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=233) I want to go through it very quickly and kind of talk about a couple of different ### segment-209 [234.8s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=234) kind of talk about a couple of different ### segment-210 [234.8s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=234) kind of talk about a couple of different things um so first of all let me che ### segment-211 [238.0s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=238) things um so first of all let me che ### segment-212 [238.0s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=238) things um so first of all let me che check very quickly if if P list I forgot ### segment-213 [240.9s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=240) check very quickly if if P list I forgot ### segment-214 [240.9s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=240) check very quickly if if P list I forgot what the tech stack is inside of here uh ### segment-215 [243.6s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=243) what the tech stack is inside of here uh ### segment-216 [243.6s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=243) what the tech stack is inside of here uh nextjs okay cool so I can Grill it on ### segment-217 [245.5s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=245) nextjs okay cool so I can Grill it on ### segment-218 [245.5s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=245) nextjs okay cool so I can Grill it on the nextjs front um other thing here and ### segment-219 [248.1s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=248) the nextjs front um other thing here and ### segment-220 [248.1s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=248) the nextjs front um other thing here and I think you are using Tailwind from ### segment-221 [250.0s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=250) I think you are using Tailwind from ### segment-222 [250.0s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=250) I think you are using Tailwind from memory so yeah you are using Tailwind ### segment-223 [252.6s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=252) memory so yeah you are using Tailwind ### segment-224 [252.6s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=252) memory so yeah you are using Tailwind but there is things like U emotion JS ### segment-225 [254.7s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=254) but there is things like U emotion JS ### segment-226 [254.7s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=254) but there is things like U emotion JS and depending on what you're doing with ### segment-227 [256.3s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=256) and depending on what you're doing with ### segment-228 [256.3s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=256) and depending on what you're doing with that um it may be worthwhile let me just ### segment-229 [259.8s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=259) that um it may be worthwhile let me just ### segment-230 [259.8s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=259) that um it may be worthwhile let me just check one more thing um yeah so so to ### segment-231 [263.1s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=263) check one more thing um yeah so so to ### segment-232 [263.1s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=263) check one more thing um yeah so so to see if you can bump the version of nexj ### segment-233 [264.8s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=264) see if you can bump the version of nexj ### segment-234 [264.8s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=264) see if you can bump the version of nexj up nextjs up and as I always say a nice ### segment-235 [267.7s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=267) up nextjs up and as I always say a nice ### segment-236 [267.7s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=267) up nextjs up and as I always say a nice easy solution to this um if you can get ### segment-237 [270.7s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=270) easy solution to this um if you can get ### segment-238 [270.7s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=270) easy solution to this um if you can get it up to the latest version and the ### segment-239 [271.9s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=271) it up to the latest version and the ### segment-240 [271.9s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=271) it up to the latest version and the canary version potentially you can run ### segment-241 [273.7s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=273) canary version potentially you can run ### segment-242 [273.7s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=273) canary version potentially you can run the experimental partial pre-rendering ### segment-243 [276.3s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=276) the experimental partial pre-rendering ### segment-244 [276.3s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=276) the experimental partial pre-rendering which means that when somebody hits your ### segment-245 [277.7s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=277) which means that when somebody hits your ### segment-246 [277.7s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=277) which means that when somebody hits your website for the first time it gets the ### segment-247 [279.3s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=279) website for the first time it gets the ### segment-248 [279.3s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=279) website for the first time it gets the response a lot faster um before you ### segment-249 [281.4s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=281) response a lot faster um before you ### segment-250 [281.4s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=281) response a lot faster um before you actually see you know the the ### segment-251 [282.6s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=282) actually see you know the the ### segment-252 [282.6s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=282) actually see you know the the interactivity of the website um so let's ### segment-253 [285.3s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=285) interactivity of the website um so let's ### segment-254 [285.3s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=285) interactivity of the website um so let's go back let's go check this out and ### segment-255 [287.4s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=287) go back let's go check this out and ### segment-256 [287.4s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=287) go back let's go check this out and let's break down the page speed insights ### segment-257 [289.7s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=289) let's break down the page speed insights ### segment-258 [289.8s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=289) let's break down the page speed insights um so again visually P list is is close ### segment-259 [293.0s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=292) um so again visually P list is is close ### segment-260 [293.0s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=293) um so again visually P list is is close to perfect ### segment-261 [294.9s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=294) to perfect ### segment-262 [294.9s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=294) to perfect as I would say and I even like the fact ### segment-263 [297.4s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=297) as I would say and I even like the fact ### segment-264 [297.4s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=297) as I would say and I even like the fact that you're not using a sanser font ### segment-265 [299.4s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=299) that you're not using a sanser font ### segment-266 [299.4s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=299) that you're not using a sanser font you're using this like semic cursive ### segment-267 [301.6s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=301) you're using this like semic cursive ### segment-268 [301.6s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=301) you're using this like semic cursive serif font um I think this looks really ### segment-269 [304.6s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=304) serif font um I think this looks really ### segment-270 [304.6s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=304) serif font um I think this looks really cool and it tells me exactly what you do ### segment-271 [306.3s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=306) cool and it tells me exactly what you do ### segment-272 [306.3s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=306) cool and it tells me exactly what you do I mean you've you've not wasted any ### segment-273 [308.0s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=307) I mean you've you've not wasted any ### segment-274 [308.0s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=308) I mean you've you've not wasted any screen re real estate with telling me ### segment-275 [310.0s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=309) screen re real estate with telling me ### segment-276 [310.0s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=310) screen re real estate with telling me you know it's a professional Network for ### segment-277 [311.4s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=311) you know it's a professional Network for ### segment-278 [311.4s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=311) you know it's a professional Network for people in Tech so yeah very impressed ### segment-279 [313.8s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=313) people in Tech so yeah very impressed ### segment-280 [313.8s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=313) people in Tech so yeah very impressed and again social proof all of these ### segment-281 [315.7s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=315) and again social proof all of these ### segment-282 [315.8s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=315) and again social proof all of these folks I know a lot of these people that ### segment-283 [317.3s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=317) folks I know a lot of these people that ### segment-284 [317.3s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=317) folks I know a lot of these people that are on here so it's really cool that ### segment-285 [319.1s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=319) are on here so it's really cool that ### segment-286 [319.2s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=319) are on here so it's really cool that you've got that too um and all these ### segment-287 [321.7s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=321) you've got that too um and all these ### segment-288 [321.7s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=321) you've got that too um and all these different bits and pieces at the bottom ### segment-289 [323.2s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=323) different bits and pieces at the bottom ### segment-290 [323.2s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=323) different bits and pieces at the bottom oh you know what I have never seen this ### segment-291 [324.8s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=324) oh you know what I have never seen this ### segment-292 [324.8s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=324) oh you know what I have never seen this before I didn't even clock this love ### segment-293 [326.4s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=326) before I didn't even clock this love ### segment-294 [326.4s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=326) before I didn't even clock this love these animations this is really nice ### segment-295 [327.9s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=327) these animations this is really nice ### segment-296 [328.0s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=327) these animations this is really nice really tasty um and fact that it it goes ### segment-297 [330.8s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=330) really tasty um and fact that it it goes ### segment-298 [330.8s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=330) really tasty um and fact that it it goes to like there you go ### segment-299 [333.4s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=333) to like there you go ### segment-300 [333.4s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=333) to like there you go cool yeah so main thread work when I was ### segment-301 [335.7s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=335) cool yeah so main thread work when I was ### segment-302 [335.7s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=335) cool yeah so main thread work when I was looking through this a lot of this is ### segment-303 [338.3s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=338) looking through this a lot of this is ### segment-304 [338.3s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=338) looking through this a lot of this is going to be um analytics tools and ### segment-305 [341.4s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=341) going to be um analytics tools and ### segment-306 [341.4s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=341) going to be um analytics tools and what's not analytics tools I would ### segment-307 [342.8s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=342) what's not analytics tools I would ### segment-308 [342.8s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=342) what's not analytics tools I would definitely recommend running next uh ### segment-309 [344.9s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=344) definitely recommend running next uh ### segment-310 [344.9s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=344) definitely recommend running next uh bundle analyzers so there is a good ### segment-311 [346.5s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=346) bundle analyzers so there is a good ### segment-312 [346.5s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=346) bundle analyzers so there is a good chunk of stuff in here that I imagine ### segment-313 [347.9s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=347) chunk of stuff in here that I imagine ### segment-314 [347.9s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=347) chunk of stuff in here that I imagine you already are aware about um and you ### segment-315 [350.5s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=350) you already are aware about um and you ### segment-316 [350.5s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=350) you already are aware about um and you basically are taking the trade off of ### segment-317 [351.9s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=351) basically are taking the trade off of ### segment-318 [351.9s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=351) basically are taking the trade off of the performance hit for the richness of ### segment-319 [353.8s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=353) the performance hit for the richness of ### segment-320 [353.8s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=353) the performance hit for the richness of the analytics however one of the ones ### segment-321 [355.7s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=355) the analytics however one of the ones ### segment-322 [355.8s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=355) the analytics however one of the ones that most people don't know about ### segment-323 [357.2s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=357) that most people don't know about ### segment-324 [357.2s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=357) that most people don't know about necessarily is the Google tag manager ### segment-325 [358.9s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=358) necessarily is the Google tag manager ### segment-326 [358.9s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=358) necessarily is the Google tag manager one so um next actually has a nextjs ### segment-327 [362.3s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=362) one so um next actually has a nextjs ### segment-328 [362.3s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=362) one so um next actually has a nextjs third party libraries section uh just ### segment-329 [365.3s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=365) third party libraries section uh just ### segment-330 [365.3s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=365) third party libraries section uh just double check whether you can actually ### segment-331 [366.5s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=366) double check whether you can actually ### segment-332 [366.5s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=366) double check whether you can actually use this so they actually have a Google ### segment-333 [368.4s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=368) use this so they actually have a Google ### segment-334 [368.4s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=368) use this so they actually have a Google tag manager and they actually have a ### segment-335 [370.8s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=370) tag manager and they actually have a ### segment-336 [370.8s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=370) tag manager and they actually have a Google analytics somewhere in here uh ### segment-337 [373.6s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=373) Google analytics somewhere in here uh ### segment-338 [373.6s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=373) Google analytics somewhere in here uh where are we there we go Google ### segment-339 [374.7s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=374) where are we there we go Google ### segment-340 [374.8s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=374) where are we there we go Google analytics so they have both um I don't ### segment-341 [376.6s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=376) analytics so they have both um I don't ### segment-342 [376.6s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=376) analytics so they have both um I don't know if you're using them already it ### segment-343 [378.4s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=378) know if you're using them already it ### segment-344 [378.4s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=378) know if you're using them already it might improve performance I'm not sure ### segment-345 [381.2s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=381) might improve performance I'm not sure ### segment-346 [381.2s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=381) might improve performance I'm not sure um but ultimately that's one of them and ### segment-347 [382.9s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=382) um but ultimately that's one of them and ### segment-348 [382.9s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=382) um but ultimately that's one of them and again I'm seeing a lot more of just ### segment-349 [385.0s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=385) again I'm seeing a lot more of just ### segment-350 [385.0s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=385) again I'm seeing a lot more of just analytics tools and such here um the ### segment-351 [387.7s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=387) analytics tools and such here um the ### segment-352 [387.7s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=387) analytics tools and such here um the minimize main threadwork so this one is ### segment-353 [389.9s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=389) minimize main threadwork so this one is ### segment-354 [389.9s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=389) minimize main threadwork so this one is almost always a misnomer uh whenever we ### segment-355 [392.9s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=392) almost always a misnomer uh whenever we ### segment-356 [392.9s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=392) almost always a misnomer uh whenever we read this uh and a lot of this is down ### segment-357 [394.8s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=394) read this uh and a lot of this is down ### segment-358 [394.8s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=394) read this uh and a lot of this is down to script evaluation which is to be ### segment-359 [396.4s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=396) to script evaluation which is to be ### segment-360 [396.4s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=396) to script evaluation which is to be expected if you pack the website ### segment-361 [398.6s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=398) expected if you pack the website ### segment-362 [398.6s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=398) expected if you pack the website absolutely full with analytics um you ### segment-363 [401.4s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=401) absolutely full with analytics um you ### segment-364 [401.4s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=401) absolutely full with analytics um you better have a good terms and conditions ### segment-365 [403.0s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=402) better have a good terms and conditions ### segment-366 [403.0s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=403) better have a good terms and conditions with that as well um but yeah so and ### segment-367 [405.7s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=405) with that as well um but yeah so and ### segment-368 [405.7s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=405) with that as well um but yeah so and largest contentful paint this absolutely ### segment-369 [407.8s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=407) largest contentful paint this absolutely ### segment-370 [407.8s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=407) largest contentful paint this absolutely tanked I have no idea why it's saying ### segment-371 [409.3s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=409) tanked I have no idea why it's saying ### segment-372 [409.3s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=409) tanked I have no idea why it's saying 19.2 seconds I have a feeling that this ### segment-373 [411.8s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=411) 19.2 seconds I have a feeling that this ### segment-374 [411.8s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=411) 19.2 seconds I have a feeling that this again is a misnomer I don't think it ### segment-375 [413.9s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=413) again is a misnomer I don't think it ### segment-376 [413.9s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=413) again is a misnomer I don't think it actually is this um but there is a ### segment-377 [416.1s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=416) actually is this um but there is a ### segment-378 [416.2s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=416) actually is this um but there is a gigantic load delay and I suspect again ### segment-379 [418.3s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=418) gigantic load delay and I suspect again ### segment-380 [418.3s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=418) gigantic load delay and I suspect again it may be due to analytic ### segment-381 [420.8s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=420) it may be due to analytic ### segment-382 [420.8s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=420) it may be due to analytic depending on what you're doing at some ### segment-383 [422.6s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=422) depending on what you're doing at some ### segment-384 [422.6s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=422) depending on what you're doing at some point it may be reducing the analytics ### segment-385 [424.8s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=424) point it may be reducing the analytics ### segment-386 [424.8s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=424) point it may be reducing the analytics on some of the pages or dynamically ### segment-387 [426.5s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=426) on some of the pages or dynamically ### segment-388 [426.5s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=426) on some of the pages or dynamically loading these in depending on what ### segment-389 [428.7s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=428) loading these in depending on what ### segment-390 [428.7s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=428) loading these in depending on what you're going to do and whether which ### segment-391 [430.1s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=430) you're going to do and whether which ### segment-392 [430.1s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=430) you're going to do and whether which analytics are important on which part of ### segment-393 [431.6s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=431) analytics are important on which part of ### segment-394 [431.6s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=431) analytics are important on which part of the site if it's just a flat importance ### segment-395 [433.8s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=433) the site if it's just a flat importance ### segment-396 [433.8s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=433) the site if it's just a flat importance and that out that basically outweighs ### segment-397 [436.7s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=436) and that out that basically outweighs ### segment-398 [436.7s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=436) and that out that basically outweighs the cost of the website itself then you ### segment-399 [439.1s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=439) the cost of the website itself then you ### segment-400 [439.1s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=439) the cost of the website itself then you know so be it um another thing I found ### segment-401 [441.6s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=441) know so be it um another thing I found ### segment-402 [441.6s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=441) know so be it um another thing I found interesting was whether you wanted to uh ### segment-403 [444.1s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=444) interesting was whether you wanted to uh ### segment-404 [444.1s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=444) interesting was whether you wanted to uh split at some point basically get them ### segment-405 [445.8s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=445) split at some point basically get them ### segment-406 [445.8s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=445) split at some point basically get them and I don't know the the the way that ### segment-407 [447.7s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=447) and I don't know the the the way that ### segment-408 [447.7s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=447) and I don't know the the the way that it's currently structured but it may be ### segment-409 [449.1s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=449) it's currently structured but it may be ### segment-410 [449.1s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=449) it's currently structured but it may be worth it some point splitting it into a ### segment-411 [450.7s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=450) worth it some point splitting it into a ### segment-412 [450.7s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=450) worth it some point splitting it into a mono repo if you haven't already um and ### segment-413 [453.5s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=453) mono repo if you haven't already um and ### segment-414 [453.5s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=453) mono repo if you haven't already um and having a kind of isolated website side ### segment-415 [456.4s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=456) having a kind of isolated website side ### segment-416 [456.4s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=456) having a kind of isolated website side of things and the app side of things so ### segment-417 [459.6s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=459) of things and the app side of things so ### segment-418 [459.6s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=459) of things and the app side of things so that the bundle basically doesn't get ### segment-419 [461.0s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=461) that the bundle basically doesn't get ### segment-420 [461.0s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=461) that the bundle basically doesn't get combined and you are essentially only ### segment-421 [462.6s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=462) combined and you are essentially only ### segment-422 [462.6s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=462) combined and you are essentially only loading those performance uh aspects on ### segment-423 [465.7s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=465) loading those performance uh aspects on ### segment-424 [465.7s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=465) loading those performance uh aspects on the web app side of things and then that ### segment-425 [467.7s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=467) the web app side of things and then that ### segment-426 [467.7s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=467) the web app side of things and then that leaves you the actual website side of ### segment-427 [469.4s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=469) leaves you the actual website side of ### segment-428 [469.4s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=469) leaves you the actual website side of things to really kind of build up on the ### segment-429 [471.1s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=471) things to really kind of build up on the ### segment-430 [471.2s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=471) things to really kind of build up on the SEO performance uh side um but yeah that ### segment-431 [474.6s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=474) SEO performance uh side um but yeah that ### segment-432 [474.6s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=474) SEO performance uh side um but yeah that was that was one of the thoughts that I ### segment-433 [476.1s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=476) was that was one of the thoughts that I ### segment-434 [476.1s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=476) was that was one of the thoughts that I had and again Google tag manager New ### segment-435 [477.7s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=477) had and again Google tag manager New ### segment-436 [477.7s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=477) had and again Google tag manager New Relic Clarity Google Analytics ### segment-437 [480.1s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=480) Relic Clarity Google Analytics ### segment-438 [480.2s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=480) Relic Clarity Google Analytics um some Cloud front stuff here I'm ### segment-439 [482.5s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=482) um some Cloud front stuff here I'm ### segment-440 [482.5s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=482) um some Cloud front stuff here I'm guessing this is just using the CDN or ### segment-441 [484.1s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=484) guessing this is just using the CDN or ### segment-442 [484.1s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=484) guessing this is just using the CDN or something along those lines um I mean ### segment-443 [487.6s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=487) something along those lines um I mean ### segment-444 [487.6s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=487) something along those lines um I mean cloud cloud front's great if you've got ### segment-445 [489.1s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=489) cloud cloud front's great if you've got ### segment-446 [489.2s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=489) cloud cloud front's great if you've got 120k in your back pocket so don't worry ### segment-447 [491.4s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=491) 120k in your back pocket so don't worry ### segment-448 [491.4s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=491) 120k in your back pocket so don't worry about that just joking obviously I don't ### segment-449 [494.0s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=493) about that just joking obviously I don't ### segment-450 [494.0s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=494) about that just joking obviously I don't know if you saw that recently but ### segment-451 [495.7s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=495) know if you saw that recently but ### segment-452 [495.7s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=495) know if you saw that recently but obviously just be aware that if you ever ### segment-453 [498.5s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=498) obviously just be aware that if you ever ### segment-454 [498.5s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=498) obviously just be aware that if you ever decide to take the pivot into gambling ### segment-455 [500.4s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=500) decide to take the pivot into gambling ### segment-456 [500.4s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=500) decide to take the pivot into gambling websites you're probably going to see a ### segment-457 [501.8s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=501) websites you're probably going to see a ### segment-458 [501.8s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=501) websites you're probably going to see a massive bill um and again um the reduce ### segment-459 [506.3s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=506) massive bill um and again um the reduce ### segment-460 [506.3s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=506) massive bill um and again um the reduce unused CSS there are some things that ### segment-461 [508.8s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=508) unused CSS there are some things that ### segment-462 [508.8s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=508) unused CSS there are some things that you can yeah basically this so the ### segment-463 [510.9s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=510) you can yeah basically this so the ### segment-464 [511.0s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=510) you can yeah basically this so the beauty of this website is that you ### segment-465 [512.4s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=512) beauty of this website is that you ### segment-466 [512.4s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=512) beauty of this website is that you actually can um put this this this now ### segment-467 [515.5s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=515) actually can um put this this this now ### segment-468 [515.6s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=515) actually can um put this this this now gives you personalized nextjs results uh ### segment-469 [517.9s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=517) gives you personalized nextjs results uh ### segment-470 [518.0s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=517) gives you personalized nextjs results uh this is only a recent thing I think it's ### segment-471 [519.2s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=519) this is only a recent thing I think it's ### segment-472 [519.2s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=519) this is only a recent thing I think it's in the last year um this lazy loading ### segment-473 [522.8s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=522) in the last year um this lazy loading ### segment-474 [522.8s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=522) in the last year um this lazy loading thing so make sure if you are using next ### segment-475 [525.8s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=525) thing so make sure if you are using next ### segment-476 [525.8s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=525) thing so make sure if you are using next image which you are not you're ### segment-477 [528.9s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=528) image which you are not you're ### segment-478 [528.9s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=528) image which you are not you're using Cloud front Okay so there's some ### segment-479 [531.6s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=531) using Cloud front Okay so there's some ### segment-480 [531.6s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=531) using Cloud front Okay so there's some sort of on the-fly optimization from ### segment-481 [533.7s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=533) sort of on the-fly optimization from ### segment-482 [533.7s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=533) sort of on the-fly optimization from cloudfront I'm guessing um basically ### segment-483 [536.6s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=536) cloudfront I'm guessing um basically ### segment-484 [536.6s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=536) cloudfront I'm guessing um basically just see if you can set priority on it ### segment-485 [538.3s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=538) just see if you can set priority on it ### segment-486 [538.3s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=538) just see if you can set priority on it if you haven't already ### segment-487 [540.0s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=539) if you haven't already ### segment-488 [540.0s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=540) if you haven't already um and rather than a lazy load but it ### segment-489 [541.8s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=541) um and rather than a lazy load but it ### segment-490 [541.8s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=541) um and rather than a lazy load but it may be a requirement with what you're ### segment-491 [543.4s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=543) may be a requirement with what you're ### segment-492 [543.4s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=543) may be a requirement with what you're doing properly sized images this is ### segment-493 [545.8s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=545) doing properly sized images this is ### segment-494 [545.8s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=545) doing properly sized images this is negligible when you see 67 kilobytes ### segment-495 [547.6s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=547) negligible when you see 67 kilobytes ### segment-496 [547.6s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=547) negligible when you see 67 kilobytes it's not a big deal a lot of this load ### segment-497 [550.0s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=549) it's not a big deal a lot of this load ### segment-498 [550.0s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=550) it's not a big deal a lot of this load is going to be inside of the actual ### segment-499 [551.4s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=551) is going to be inside of the actual ### segment-500 [551.4s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=551) is going to be inside of the actual JavaScript itself rather than anything ### segment-501 [553.2s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=553) JavaScript itself rather than anything ### segment-502 [553.2s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=553) JavaScript itself rather than anything else um the efficient efficient cash ### segment-503 [556.7s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=556) else um the efficient efficient cash ### segment-504 [556.7s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=556) else um the efficient efficient cash policy again this is all CDN stuff by ### segment-505 [558.8s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=558) policy again this is all CDN stuff by ### segment-506 [558.8s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=558) policy again this is all CDN stuff by the looks of it which makes ### segment-507 [561.6s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=561) the looks of it which makes ### segment-508 [561.6s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=561) the looks of it which makes sense uh anything inside of here ### segment-509 [564.1s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=564) sense uh anything inside of here ### segment-510 [564.1s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=564) sense uh anything inside of here analytics ### segment-511 [565.8s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=565) analytics ### segment-512 [565.8s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=565) analytics nope uh ### segment-513 [567.6s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=567) nope uh ### segment-514 [567.6s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=567) nope uh Legacy okay sometimes times I'm not sure ### segment-515 [570.5s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=570) Legacy okay sometimes times I'm not sure ### segment-516 [570.5s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=570) Legacy okay sometimes times I'm not sure if this is the same oh it's look I'm not ### segment-517 [573.7s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=573) if this is the same oh it's look I'm not ### segment-518 [573.7s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=573) if this is the same oh it's look I'm not going to I'm not going to get bent out ### segment-519 [574.8s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=574) going to I'm not going to get bent out ### segment-520 [574.8s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=574) going to I'm not going to get bent out of shape over that I mean it's even ### segment-521 [576.2s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=576) of shape over that I mean it's even ### segment-522 [576.2s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=576) of shape over that I mean it's even saying zero kilobytes here and the ### segment-523 [578.9s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=578) saying zero kilobytes here and the ### segment-524 [579.0s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=578) saying zero kilobytes here and the network payload so I'm guessing this is ### segment-525 [580.7s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=580) network payload so I'm guessing this is ### segment-526 [580.7s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=580) network payload so I'm guessing this is due to the amount of data that gets ### segment-527 [582.3s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=582) due to the amount of data that gets ### segment-528 [582.3s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=582) due to the amount of data that gets passed across I have a feeling it's ### segment-529 [584.1s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=584) passed across I have a feeling it's ### segment-530 [584.2s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=584) passed across I have a feeling it's going to be the majority if it's going ### segment-531 [585.8s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=585) going to be the majority if it's going ### segment-532 [585.8s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=585) going to be the majority if it's going to be related to that so um from a ### segment-533 [588.2s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=588) to be related to that so um from a ### segment-534 [588.2s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=588) to be related to that so um from a performance perspective um you you can ### segment-535 [591.3s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=591) performance perspective um you you can ### segment-536 [591.3s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=591) performance perspective um you you can do better you can get this PPR stuff ### segment-537 [593.2s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=593) do better you can get this PPR stuff ### segment-538 [593.2s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=593) do better you can get this PPR stuff working and it would basically put this ### segment-539 [595.5s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=595) working and it would basically put this ### segment-540 [595.6s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=595) working and it would basically put this um you know this like progression over ### segment-541 [597.9s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=597) um you know this like progression over ### segment-542 [597.9s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=597) um you know this like progression over time it would load a little bit earlier ### segment-543 [600.2s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=600) time it would load a little bit earlier ### segment-544 [600.2s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=600) time it would load a little bit earlier but it depends on the latest version of ### segment-545 [602.0s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=602) but it depends on the latest version of ### segment-546 [602.0s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=602) but it depends on the latest version of nextjs and I know this is a massive ### segment-547 [604.6s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=604) nextjs and I know this is a massive ### segment-548 [604.6s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=604) nextjs and I know this is a massive application so it's a bit optimistic to ### segment-549 [606.9s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=606) application so it's a bit optimistic to ### segment-550 [607.0s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=606) application so it's a bit optimistic to say you know oh just just go up to the ### segment-551 [608.8s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=608) say you know oh just just go up to the ### segment-552 [608.8s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=608) say you know oh just just go up to the latest version and just make it work but ### segment-553 [610.9s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=610) latest version and just make it work but ### segment-554 [611.0s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=610) latest version and just make it work but that would be one of the things that's a ### segment-555 [612.5s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=612) that would be one of the things that's a ### segment-556 [612.5s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=612) that would be one of the things that's a nice easy fix because it should in ### segment-557 [614.1s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=614) nice easy fix because it should in ### segment-558 [614.1s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=614) nice easy fix because it should in theory only be um three lines I believe ### segment-559 [618.7s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=618) theory only be um three lines I believe ### segment-560 [618.7s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=618) theory only be um three lines I believe oh last thing I want to check as well um ### segment-561 [620.9s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=620) oh last thing I want to check as well um ### segment-562 [621.0s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=620) oh last thing I want to check as well um if I hit the network very quick I always ### segment-563 [623.0s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=623) if I hit the network very quick I always ### segment-564 [623.0s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=623) if I hit the network very quick I always like to check if you are caching this um ### segment-565 [625.7s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=625) like to check if you are caching this um ### segment-566 [625.7s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=625) like to check if you are caching this um so I hit this here and you can go have a ### segment-567 [627.4s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=627) so I hit this here and you can go have a ### segment-568 [627.4s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=627) so I hit this here and you can go have a look and see if there is is ### segment-569 [631.2s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=631) look and see if there is is ### segment-570 [631.2s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=631) look and see if there is is a uh this doesn't look like it's being ### segment-571 [635.1s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=635) a uh this doesn't look like it's being ### segment-572 [635.1s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=635) a uh this doesn't look like it's being cached how is it being ### segment-573 [638.3s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=638) cached how is it being ### segment-574 [638.3s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=638) cached how is it being handled okay yeah so I have a feeling ### segment-575 [640.6s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=640) handled okay yeah so I have a feeling ### segment-576 [640.6s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=640) handled okay yeah so I have a feeling this isn't cached but I also think it ### segment-577 [642.7s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=642) this isn't cached but I also think it ### segment-578 [642.7s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=642) this isn't cached but I also think it may be because you're doing it ### segment-579 [644.3s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=644) may be because you're doing it ### segment-580 [644.3s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=644) may be because you're doing it specifically um and I don't know I can't ### segment-581 [646.8s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=646) specifically um and I don't know I can't ### segment-582 [646.8s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=646) specifically um and I don't know I can't give you exact specific advice because ### segment-583 [649.5s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=649) give you exact specific advice because ### segment-584 [649.5s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=649) give you exact specific advice because of how it's being built how is it being ### segment-585 [652.9s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=652) of how it's being built how is it being ### segment-586 [652.9s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=652) of how it's being built how is it being built oh also I know that Microsoft ### segment-587 [654.9s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=654) built oh also I know that Microsoft ### segment-588 [654.9s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=654) built oh also I know that Microsoft Clarity is pretty good because this is ### segment-589 [656.2s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=656) Clarity is pretty good because this is ### segment-590 [656.2s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=656) Clarity is pretty good because this is this is basically hot jaw but for free ### segment-591 [658.2s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=658) this is basically hot jaw but for free ### segment-592 [658.2s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=658) this is basically hot jaw but for free that Google's pretty much fronting the ### segment-593 [660.3s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=660) that Google's pretty much fronting the ### segment-594 [660.3s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=660) that Google's pretty much fronting the cost on ### segment-595 [663.0s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=663) cost on ### segment-596 [663.0s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=663) cost on um I see yeah you're doing something ### segment-597 [665.3s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=665) um I see yeah you're doing something ### segment-598 [665.3s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=665) um I see yeah you're doing something custom from the hos inside um I I would ### segment-599 [668.5s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=668) custom from the hos inside um I I would ### segment-600 [668.5s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=668) custom from the hos inside um I I would not want to comment on that because they ### segment-601 [669.9s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=669) not want to comment on that because they ### segment-602 [669.9s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=669) not want to comment on that because they can be so wildly different for ### segment-603 [671.4s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=671) can be so wildly different for ### segment-604 [671.4s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=671) can be so wildly different for everybody's individual uh circumstances ### segment-605 [673.9s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=673) everybody's individual uh circumstances ### segment-606 [673.9s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=673) everybody's individual uh circumstances so I hope that is a good Grill and a ### segment-607 [676.9s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=676) so I hope that is a good Grill and a ### segment-608 [676.9s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=676) so I hope that is a good Grill and a good uh set of feedback tell me if ### segment-609 [679.2s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=679) good uh set of feedback tell me if ### segment-610 [679.2s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=679) good uh set of feedback tell me if there's anything in particular you want ### segment-611 [680.3s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=680) there's anything in particular you want ### segment-612 [680.3s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=680) there's anything in particular you want me to go back to you with in granular ### segment-613 [682.5s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=682) me to go back to you with in granular ### segment-614 [682.5s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=682) me to go back to you with in granular detail and we'll try and help out but ### segment-615 [684.5s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=684) detail and we'll try and help out but ### segment-616 [684.5s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=684) detail and we'll try and help out but yeah hope you have a great day and keep ### segment-617 [686.3s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=686) yeah hope you have a great day and keep ### segment-618 [686.3s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=686) yeah hope you have a great day and keep making incredible work so yeah take care ### segment-619 [688.5s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=688) making incredible work so yeah take care ### segment-620 [688.5s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oChfqq4e9lY&t=688) making incredible work so yeah take care bye